Policies
 Why Africa Needs Green Revolution in 2025
AgroCentric | 24th January 2026

The conversation around Africa’s food future is no longer theoretical. Climate disruptions, rapid population growth, unstable food imports, and global supply chain pressures have pushed the continent to a point where agricultural transformation is no longer optional but a survival requirement. Yet, most public discussions still recycle clichés that oversimplify Africa’s challenges. 

The truth is that a Green Revolution for Africa in 2025 cannot look like the Asian Green Revolution of the 1960s. Africa’s landscapes, resource distribution, cultural patterns, political institutions, and market systems are unique. Therefore, Africa needs its own model, shaped by local realities and modern technologies.

This article debunks the myths around the Green Revolution to expose outdated thinking, clarify modern policy needs, and offer actionable paths forward. It also includes controversial truths about African agriculture.

MYTHBUSTING AFRICA’S GREEN REVOLUTION

1) Africa Needs More Farmland

This assumption creates the false impression that productivity problems are solved by expanding land, when in reality, Africa already possesses abundant farmland. What Africa lacks is productive farmland. A large percentage of existing agricultural land depends solely on rainfall, and that alone makes production unstable. When unpredictable weather hits (something increasingly common with climate change) entire harvest cycles collapse.

Realistically, what Africa truly needs in 2025 is efficient irrigation systems, rehabilitated soils, reliable extension support, and market infrastructure that prevents post-harvest losses. Increasing land area without increasing productivity is like adding more cups to a leaking water tank.

2) Just Give Farmers Fertilisers and Yields Will Rise

This belief has shaped donor programmes for decades, yet it consistently fails because it ignores soil diversity. African soils vary dramatically from region to region, meaning that what works in Kenya’s volcanic highlands may fail in northern Nigeria or Mozambique. Fertiliser without proper soil analysis often leads to waste, soil degradation, and debt.

The real solution is data-driven soil management (such as local soil testing, tailored fertiliser blends, organic matter restoration, and integrated nutrient strategies). Fertiliser is not the enemy, but ignorance is. In 2025, Africa needs a shift from “apply more” to “apply appropriately.”

3) Mechanisation Equals Tractors

Tractors make for good political photographs but terrible long-term mechanisation strategies when maintenance systems are absent. Thousands of tractors distributed across Africa sit abandoned due to a lack of spare parts, poor training, or unrealistic expectations placed on smallholder farmers.

Mechanisation in 2025 must focus on service models that are shared, rentable, and supported by trained technicians. It should also embrace smaller innovations, such as mini-harvesters, threshers, solar-powered dryers, and drones. In truth, Africa needs a mechanisation ecosystem, not random machines scattered across farmlands.

4) Youth Do Not Care about Agriculture

What youth reject is subsistence farming soaked in suffering. They reject poverty, not agriculture. Young Africans are drawn to modern agribusiness sectors such as logistics, greenhouse technology, commercial poultry, drone-enabled crop mapping, digital marketplaces, and climate-smart production systems.

In 2025, the challenge is to create conditions where young people can access land, finance, technology, and mentorship without confronting entrenched traditional systems. When agriculture becomes profitable, youth participation becomes automatic.

5) More Donors Will Solve the Agricultural Problem

Donors often ignite innovation, but they cannot bear entire national food systems. Their projects are temporary by design. Africa’s food transformation requires stable policies, long-term investment, predictable regulations, and national ownership. The simple truth is that Africa cannot outsource its agricultural destiny. It must build systems that function even when donor activities conclude.

OLD GREEN REVOLUTION VS. AFRICA’S 2025 MODEL

Below is a comparison of Africa’s old Green Revolution and the 2025 model that goes beyond surface-level one-liners. The comparison reveals that Africa’s agricultural revolution is no longer about growing crops. Instead, it is about building a functioning system.

Dimension

Focus of Intervention 

Old Green Revolution Model

Increasing production through high-yield seeds and fertilisers

Africa’s Required 2025 Model

Building whole food systems, from soil to market, using climate-smart and tech-driven approaches

Dimension

Farmer Type Assumed

Old Green Revolution Model

Large-scale, uniform farmers

Africa’s Required 2025 Model

Millions of smallholders with diverse soils, practices, and needs

Dimension 

Technology Philosophy

Old Green Revolution Model

Machines first, services second

Africa’s Required 2025 Model

Reliable service models, maintenance training, and scalable tech ecosystems

Dimension

Youth Role

Old Green Revolution Model

Seen as uninterested or unwilling

Africa’s Required 2025 Model

Seen as innovators driving agritech, processing, digital markets, and drone services

Dimension

Policy Approach

Old Green Revolution Model

Donor-led pilots

Africa’s Required 2025 Model

Nationally-led, locally-funded, multi-decade strategies that survive political cycles

Dimension

Infrastructure Priority

Old Green Revolution Model

Irrigation and seeds

Africa’s Required 2025 Model

Irrigation plus storage, processing, logistics, rural energy, and market stabilisation

Dimension 

Sustainability Lens

Old Green Revolution Model

Secondary concern

Africa’s Required 2025 Model

Central requirement due to climate instability

Dimension

Market Logic

Old Green Revolution Model

Produce more

Africa’s Required 2025 Model

Reduce waste, improve value addition, create stable buyer networks

ACTIONABLE TIPS FOR 2026

Firstly, policymakers must treat agriculture as infrastructure, not charity. They must:

  • make national soil testing data publicly available
  • invest heavily in irrigation instead of throwing money at untargeted fertiliser subsidies, and 
  • ensure land leasing laws allow young people and agribusinesses to scale their operations without political interference. 

They should also establish predictable market policies to prevent sudden price collapses after harvest.

On the other hand, farmers should begin to embrace soil testing as a routine part of production rather than a luxury. This single step can save money and drastically improve yields. They should also collaborate through cooperatives that allow them to access machinery or processing tools collectively.  By using digital platforms that display real-time market prices, farmers can avoid exploitation by middlemen and negotiate from a position of strength.

Furthermore, agribusiness entrepreneurs should invest in the most neglected but profitable parts of the value chain. These areas (storage, transportation, and processing) are where Africa loses billions annually. Offering drone services, mobile extension support, or farm-to-market delivery solutions can generate high returns. In a continent with post-harvest losses as high as 40%, the business opportunity is not just in growing food, it is in protecting and moving it.

Africa needs a Green Revolution built on truth, not myths, nostalgia, or outdated assumptions. The continent must embrace climate resilience, invest in data-driven decisions, modernise value chains, support youth-led agribusiness, reform land and financing systems, and prioritise irrigation and mechanisation services over random input distribution.