Policies
ADIFAL: An Exposition on Nigeria’s Defence-Led Agricultural Initiative
Oluwafisola Ajayi | 8th November 2025

Nigeria’s agricultural sector is directly significant to the country’s economic diversification agenda. Yet, despite its vast arable land and human resources, food production is constrained by insecurity, poor infrastructure, and limited access to modern technology. 

As a result, the Federal Government has called on the Armed Forces to contribute directly to food security initiatives, leading to the Nigerian Navy launching Admiralty Integrated Farms Limited (ADIFAL) in June 2025. 

Conceived as a specialised subsidiary of Navy Holdings Limited, ADIFAL aims to combine national security capabilities with agricultural innovation. 

Its mandate goes beyond primary production; it seeks to secure farmlands, integrate precision agriculture tools such as artificial intelligence and satellite imaging, and promote sustainable agribusiness models that can strengthen Nigeria’s food system.

By combining defence infrastructure with modern farming practices, ADIFAL represents a novel approach to agricultural policy and practice in Nigeria. It symbolises a practical response to food security challenges and a strategic attempt to reposition agriculture as a national security priority.

Why ADIFAL?

For decades, Nigeria has struggled to meet its food demand. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), over 25 million people in Nigeria faced acute food insecurity in 2023

Despite producing nearly 9 million tonnes of rice annually, Nigeria still imports about 43% of its rice needs. Staple crops such as maize, sorghum, and millet also fail to meet demand, while livestock markets remain heavily reliant on smallholder farmers in insecure northern regions.

At the same time, insecurity has worsened. Armed banditry, farmer-herder conflicts, and insurgency have displaced thousands of farming households. In states such as Borno, Zamfara, Benue, and Niger, entire farming communities have been cut off from their farmlands.

Considering the situation, the Nigerian Armed Forces have emerged as unlikely yet capable actors in agricultural revival, leveraging their logistical capacity, land holdings, and security networks. 

ADIFAL was conceived as part of this push: to protect food production, leverage military infrastructure for farming, and demonstrate how security institutions can contribute directly to economic resilience.

ADIFAL operates under Navy Holdings Limited, the commercial arm of the Nigerian Navy responsible for non-core defence businesses. Unlike conventional agricultural companies, ADIFAL’s unique features include:

  1. Integration with Security Infrastructure: Farmlands cultivated under ADIFAL benefit from naval and allied military security, reducing the risks posed by bandits or insurgents.
  2. Use of Technology: The initiative is expected to deploy artificial intelligence, precision agriculture tools, and satellite monitoring for crop management, soil analysis, and yield prediction.
  3. Diversified Agribusiness Model: ADIFAL’s scope extends beyond primary farming to encompass agro-processing, logistics, and potentially, exports. This reflects a value chain approach rather than subsistence production.
  4. Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): While Navy Holdings retains ownership, ADIFAL is structured to collaborate with private investors, agricultural cooperatives, and research institutions, blending public mandate with market efficiency.
  5. Contribution to National Food Reserves: A portion of its output is expected to contribute to Nigeria’s Strategic Food Reserve System, helping to stabilise markets during shortages.

Comparative Policy Context

ADIFAL is not the first attempt at food security in Nigeria. Previous initiatives include:

  • Operation Feed the Nation (1976) aimed to encourage mass participation in farming.
  • The Green Revolution (1980s)focused on mechanised, large-scale agriculture.
  • The Agricultural Transformation Agenda (2011–2015) promoted agribusiness and input subsidies.

What distinguishes ADIFAL is its security dimension. Unlike prior policies, ADIFAL leverages the authority and infrastructure of the Armed Forces to secure production and ensure continuity in fragile regions.

Globally, the concept of “defence-led agriculture” is not unprecedented. For example, in Israel, military-linked kibbutzim played key roles in food security during periods of national conflict. 

Similarly, the military runs large agribusiness enterprises in Egypt, supplying domestic markets and exports. Nigeria’s ADIFAL mirrors such models, though it is adapted to local realities.

Potential Benefits of ADIFAL

  • Enhanced Food Security

With secured farmlands and modern technology, ADIFAL could boost the production of staples such as rice, maize, and sorghum.

  • Job Creation and Training

By engaging ex-servicemen, youth corps members, and local communities, ADIFAL may create employment opportunities while transferring skills in modern agronomy and agribusiness.

  • Stabilisation of Conflict Zones

Farming in secure zones can reduce displacement, resettle rural communities, and provide alternative livelihoods in conflict-hosted states.

  • Boost to Agricultural Exports

With proper processing and quality control, ADIFAL could support Nigeria’s ambition to compete in global agricultural markets.

  • Demonstration Effect

If successful, ADIFAL may serve as a model for Army and Air Force equivalents, as well as for state governments seeking innovative approaches to food production.

Challenges and Risks

Although promising, ADIFAL faces critical hurdles such as:

  • Governance and Transparency

Military-owned businesses in Nigeria have often been criticised for opacity. Without strict oversight, ADIFAL risks becoming inefficient or politicised.

  • Crowding Out the Private Sector

There is a delicate balance between leveraging military resources and stifling private agribusiness competition. ADIFAL must operate under clear rules to avoid distorting markets.

  • Sustainability of Funding

Large-scale mechanisation and technological integration require significant capital. If government subsidies dry up, ADIFAL may struggle without viable Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs).

  • Civil–Military Relations

Expanding military roles into economic sectors can raise concerns about the militarisation of development. Careful legal frameworks must delineate ADIFAL’s commercial scope from core defence duties.

  • Environmental and Social Impacts

Large mechanised farms, if poorly managed, could disrupt ecosystems or displace smallholders. Community engagement will be essential to mitigate conflicts.

Policy and Legal Dimensions

For ADIFAL to thrive, several legal and policy considerations must be addressed:

  • Regulatory Alignment: ADIFAL must comply with the Nigerian Agricultural Policy, Land Use Act, and Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA). Its PPPs should align with the Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC) Act.
  • Food Safety Compliance: The output must meet the standards outlined in the National Food Safety and Quality Bill (2022), ensuring both domestic and export readiness.
  • Public Finance Rules: If ADIFAL receives budgetary allocations, it should be subject to audit by the Office of the Auditor-General and oversight by the National Assembly.
  • Competition Policy: Nigeria’s Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) must ensure ADIFAL does not monopolise key agricultural markets.

Outlook: Will ADIFAL Deliver?

The success of ADIFAL depends on its ability to avoid the pitfalls of past agricultural interventions. Programmes like Operation Feed the Nation and the Green Revolution often failed due to poor coordination, corruption, and lack of continuity. 

ADIFAL has an advantage in security integration and modern technology; however, its governance framework and partnerships will ultimately determine its sustainability.

If implemented transparently, ADIFAL could become a flagship model for linking agriculture with national security in Africa. It could demonstrate how defence institutions can be development partners, not just protectors of sovereignty.

Conclusion

ADIFAL is an ambitious experiment at the intersection of agriculture, security, and economic policy. It reflects Nigeria’s recognition that food security is inseparable from national security. Its potential benefits, from stabilising rural communities to boosting exports, are significant. Yet the risks of governance failures, market distortions, and over-militarisation are equally real.

Its success will rest on robust governance frameworks, transparent partnerships, and sustained political will. For agricultural enthusiasts, researchers, and policymakers, ADIFAL offers both a blueprint and a benchmark for how Nigeria might reimagine food security in the face of twenty-first-century challenges.

ADIFAL is a bold step, but the road to food security extends beyond a single initiative. 

Read an analysis about the policy reforms needed to achieve food security in Nigeria